Tucker Carlson's Explosive Hamas Theory: Ted Cruz Condemns 'Reckless' Comments on Israel Attack
Cruz Condemns Carlson's "Reckless" Hamas-Israel Theory

American politics has been rocked by a fiery condemnation from Senator Ted Cruz, directed at former Fox News commentator Tucker Carlson over what he labels "reckless" and "highly damaging" commentary on the Israel-Hamas conflict.

The controversy erupted after Carlson used his popular online platform to suggest a shocking possibility: that elements within the United States intelligence community might have had prior knowledge of, or even assisted, Hamas in planning its devastating October 7th attack on Israel.

A Senator's Furious Rebuke

Senator Cruz, a prominent Republican figure known for his staunch support of Israel, did not mince words. He publicly castigated Carlson's theory as not only baseless but also dangerously inflammatory.

"Spreading such conjecture without a shred of credible evidence is irresponsible in the extreme," Cruz stated, emphasising that it undermines key alliances and plays into harmful propaganda narratives at a time of intense conflict.

The Carlson Theory That Sparked Outrage

Carlson's comments, made during a recent episode of his show on X (formerly Twitter), questioned the operational capabilities of Hamas. He pondered how the group could have orchestrated such a complex, coordinated attack without external support, pointing a finger at potential "state-level" assistance.

While Carlson stopped short of presenting evidence, his implication that US agencies could be involved sent shockwaves through political circles, drawing immediate criticism from both sides of the aisle.

The Wider Fallout and Political Divide

The incident highlights the deepening fissures within American political discourse, particularly concerning the Israel-Hamas war. It underscores the power of influential media personalities to shape narratives and the growing tension between unsubstantiated claims and factual reporting.

As the war in Gaza continues to escalate, the episode serves as a stark reminder of how domestic political commentary can have profound implications for international relations and public understanding of complex global events.