In a dramatic exchange at the G20 summit, UK Business Secretary Kemi Badenoch has delivered a stinging rebuke to Argentina's libertarian President Javier Milei after his controversial remarks comparing Britain's economy to a 'chainsaw massacre'.
The fiery clash erupted when President Milei - known for his radical economic views - claimed the UK was suffering from a 'bloated state' during discussions about global economic policies.
Ms Badenoch didn't mince her words in her response, telling reporters: 'It's rich coming from the leader of a country that has defaulted on its debt nine times. Perhaps President Milei should focus on fixing Argentina's economy before lecturing others.'
The Argentine leader, who often carries a chainsaw as a prop to symbolise his plans to cut government spending, had made the inflammatory comments during a panel discussion about economic reform.
Diplomatic Tensions Rise at G20
The war of words has created unexpected tension at the international summit, with observers noting the unusually blunt language from both sides. Political analysts suggest the exchange reflects broader ideological divides between Milei's radical libertarianism and Badenoch's brand of pragmatic conservatism.
'This isn't just about economics,' said one Whitehall source. 'There are real questions about whether Argentina under Milei can be a reliable international partner when he makes such deliberately provocative statements.'
Background to the Conflict
The spat comes at a sensitive time for UK-Argentina relations, with ongoing disputes over the Falkland Islands still simmering in the background. Some commentators have suggested Milei's comments may have been designed to play to his domestic audience rather than engage in serious economic debate.
Meanwhile, Ms Badenoch's robust defence of Britain's economic position has been welcomed by Conservative backbenchers, with several MPs praising her for 'standing up for British interests' on the international stage.
As the G20 continues, all eyes will be watching whether this war of words develops into a more serious diplomatic incident or whether both sides can find common ground on other economic issues.
