Nearly 1,000 houses and a care home could be built around the Stockport village of Woodford if two planning applications are approved. Councillors are due to consider the applications on October 22, with both facing opposition over green belt concerns.
Two applications for Woodford sites
One application, from Barratt Homes and David Wilson Homes, seeks to develop land at Upper Swineseye Farm and build up to 455 homes, with 50% designated as affordable. Stockport council officers are recommending this plan be rejected.
A design and access statement for the application said the development "seeks to complement and enrich its neighbour through a cohesive urban form, integrated green infrastructure, and strengthened pedestrian and cycle connections," adding that it "will deliver much-needed new homes, contributing to a vibrant and inclusive community."
Opposition and concerns raised
However, 180 people and Poynton Town Council have raised objections, citing surface water flooding on part of the site. Objectors also argue the plans would result in "the loss of open, pristine countryside," worsen congestion, and harm views of the Pennines.
They claim the village has become "oversaturated with development" and the plans would have a "catastrophic" impact on wildlife areas. A council report summarising the opposition said people felt "this would contribute to a cumulative, irreversible urbanisation entirely inconsistent with the historic, semi-rural character of Woodford." Another issue raised was that new homes "would make [it] that much harder" for "young people to be able to get into the countryside and away from social media."
Second application recommended for approval
In contrast, plans from JAG Woodford Ltd and Russell LDP for land south of Chester Road are being recommended for approval at the same meeting. This could see 423 houses built, along with up to 72 apartments for those aged over 55 and a 72-bed care home.
The plans also promise a health centre, a day nursery, and some retail or food and drink space. 50% of the homes would be affordable, and a "nature park" would be created. Despite opposition from 220 people, largely concerned about green belt loss and overdevelopment, officers recommend approval.
A council report said there was "a pressing need for new homes" and significant benefits. It concluded: "In conclusion, whilst noting the adverse impacts of the proposed development in relation to harm to the green belt, loss of dwellings and impact on heritage assets, there would be a considerable number of benefits over a much wider range of considerations."
Next steps for the applications
Highways officers said the first development is in "an unsustainable location and lacks connectivity," with Transport for Greater Manchester raising similar concerns. Nearby Cheshire East Council is also opposed, while local NHS bosses want £612,352 to support "insufficient" healthcare services.
At the area committee for Bramhall and Cheadle Hulme South, no final decision will be made. Councillors will instead make a recommendation for colleagues on the local authority's planning committee.
