In a bold and contentious move, several Democrat-led cities across the US have introduced a programme that pays methamphetamine addicts to stay sober. The initiative, designed to curb drug abuse and reduce harm, has ignited a heated debate among policymakers, health experts, and the public.
How the Programme Works
The scheme offers financial rewards—often in the form of gift cards or cash—to individuals who test negative for methamphetamine in regular screenings. Supporters argue that this approach provides immediate incentives for recovery, particularly for those struggling with addiction.
Supporters vs. Critics
Proponents claim the programme is a pragmatic harm-reduction strategy, reducing crime and healthcare costs linked to addiction. "It’s about meeting people where they are," said one public health official. "Small rewards can motivate long-term change."
Opponents, however, dismiss it as a misguided use of taxpayer money. "This is enabling, not treating," argued a critic. "We need rehabilitation, not handouts."
Does It Deliver Results?
Early data suggests mixed outcomes. Some participants have maintained sobriety, while others relapse despite the incentives. Critics demand more transparency on long-term success rates and cost-effectiveness.
The Bigger Picture
The debate reflects broader divisions in drug policy—punishment versus rehabilitation, short-term fixes versus sustainable solutions. As meth addiction surges nationwide, cities are under pressure to find answers—even controversial ones.
