A leading child safety charity has warned that a rushed under-16s social media ban in the UK could unravel, leaving families to bear the consequences. The Molly Rose Foundation (MRF) expressed concerns after reports that Prime Minister Keir Starmer would announce a ban on under-16s accessing harmful social media apps. However, it remains unclear which apps would be included, while Australia's blanket ban covers platforms like Facebook, Instagram, X, TikTok, and Snapchat.
Charity's Concerns Over Circumvention
MRF, founded by the family of Molly Russell—a teenager who died by suicide after viewing harmful content on Instagram and Pinterest—argues that a ban would not enhance child safety. Children could easily bypass age checks and migrate to less regulated spaces like gaming. Andy Burrows, MRF's chief executive, stated that a rushed ban would quickly unravel and lacks evidence-based support. He emphasized that parents want effective action, not short-term announcements that could undermine child protection.
Government's Timetable and Political Context
The Times reported on Sunday that the government plans to announce the ban before the Makerfield byelection on 18 June. Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham, contesting the seat for Labour, has said he will challenge Starmer for party leadership if he wins. A consultation on children's online safety, including a potential under-16s ban, closed last week, but the government is eager to act swiftly on its findings.
A selective UK ban would differ from Australia's approach, which imposes age limits on services enabling social interaction and user posting. The UK government is also consulting on age restrictions for features like infinite scrolling and AI chatbots.
Alternative Proposals from MRF
MRF proposes that the government enforce strict safety standards for social media apps, such as limiting personalised algorithms that curate content for teenagers. Apps would only be banned after failing to meet these requirements. MRF, which has received funding from Meta (Instagram's owner), says this approach gives apps a chance to improve before facing bans.
Criticism from Online Safety Advocates
Crossbench peer Beeban Kidron labelled the reported proposal a non-ban ban, accusing ministers of softening safety measures. She criticised the government's three-month deadline for Apple and Google to install anti-nudity software on smartphones, arguing that tech companies prioritise profit over safety. Labour MP Fred Thomas, who organised a letter urging Starmer to back a ban, supports bold action but acknowledges the need for agility as platforms evolve. However, some Labour MPs express frustration, urging the government to proceed with a ban without further delays.
A government spokesperson reiterated their commitment to acting quickly and effectively, ensuring measures are enforceable and genuinely protect children.
