Fox News personality Pete Hegseth has found himself at the centre of another media storm after making extraordinary claims about drug cartels using sophisticated submarines to breach US border security.
During a recent broadcast, the controversial host asserted that narcotics traffickers were employing fully submersible vessels to evade detection while transporting illegal substances into the United States. His dramatic portrayal of this alleged threat quickly captured attention across social media platforms and news outlets.
Naval Experts Pour Cold Water on Claims
Military and naval authorities have thoroughly debunked Hegseth's submarine narrative, clarifying that while drug smugglers do use various maritime vessels, true submarines remain beyond their operational capabilities.
"What cartels actually use are semi-submersibles - low-profile vessels that mostly remain underwater but cannot fully submerge like military submarines," explained one naval security analyst. "The distinction is crucial and Hegseth's characterization dramatically exaggerates the actual threat."
Fact-Checkers Swing into Action
Multiple independent fact-checking organisations have confirmed that no evidence supports the existence of drug cartels operating genuine submarines. The claims appear to be part of a pattern of border security exaggeration that has become increasingly common in certain media circles.
Social media users were quick to mock the assertions, with many comparing the story to something from an action movie rather than reality-based journalism. Memes and satirical posts flooded platforms within hours of the broadcast.
Pattern of Controversial Statements
This incident marks the latest in a series of controversial moments for Hegseth, who has previously faced criticism for various inaccurate statements and conspiracy theories promoted on air.
Media watchdogs have expressed concern about the persistent spread of misinformation regarding border security, noting that such claims can influence public perception and policy debates despite being factually inaccurate.
The controversy comes amid ongoing debates about immigration and border control in American politics, with exaggerated claims often clouding factual discussions about actual security challenges.
