The UK's landmark independent inquiry into grooming gangs has been thrown into turmoil following the dramatic resignation of Fiona Goddard, one of its most prominent victim representatives.
In a devastating blow to the investigation's credibility, Goddard announced her departure from the panel, citing profound concerns about the inquiry's direction and its failure to adequately support survivors of child sexual exploitation.
Systemic Failures Prompt Departure
Goddard, who brings both professional expertise as a lawyer and personal experience as a survivor of grooming gang abuse, expressed deep frustration with what she described as systemic problems within the inquiry's structure. Her resignation letter outlines multiple areas of concern that have compromised the investigation's effectiveness.
The decision to step down comes after months of internal struggles, with Goddard reportedly raising repeated concerns about the inquiry's approach to victim support and procedural fairness.
Victim-Centred Approach Questioned
Central to Goddard's resignation is her belief that the inquiry has failed to maintain its promised victim-centred focus. Sources close to the panel suggest she had grown increasingly concerned that survivors' voices were being marginalised in key decision-making processes.
"When those who understand the trauma firsthand are sidelined, the entire purpose of such an inquiry is undermined," one insider commented, speaking on condition of anonymity.
Impact on Inquiry's Future
Goddard's departure represents a significant setback for the high-profile investigation, which was established to examine institutional responses to grooming gangs across multiple UK towns and cities. Her unique perspective as both a legal professional and survivor made her an invaluable asset to the panel.
The resignation raises serious questions about the inquiry's ability to deliver meaningful recommendations and restore public confidence in how authorities handle complex child exploitation cases.
Calls for Fundamental Review
Survivor advocacy groups have expressed alarm at the development, with several calling for an immediate review of the inquiry's operations and leadership. Many fear that without Goddard's influential voice, the investigation risks losing its connection to the very people it's meant to serve.
The Home Office faces mounting pressure to address the concerns raised and ensure the inquiry can continue with both credibility and effectiveness intact.
