Trump Faces Court Showdown Over $464m Bond as Letitia James Pushes for Asset Seizures
Trump faces court over $464m bond in fraud case

In a dramatic courtroom confrontation, New York Attorney General Letitia James has intensified her pursuit of Donald Trump's assets, challenging the former president's claims that finding financial backing for his massive civil fraud penalty is "impossible."

The $464 Million Question

During a tense hearing before a five-judge appellate panel in Manhattan, Trump's legal team argued they've approached 35 surety companies without success in securing a bond for the staggering $464 million judgment. James's office countered that Trump's difficulties stem from his own making, noting he controls substantial assets that could satisfy the debt.

A Race Against Time

The legal showdown comes with critical timing implications. Trump faces a Monday deadline to either secure a bond or convince the appeals court to pause enforcement of the judgment while he challenges the underlying verdict. Failure could allow James to begin seizing Trump properties and freezing bank accounts.

Properties in the Crosshairs

Prosecutors have already taken preliminary steps toward seizing Trump's assets, filing judgments in Westchester County where the former president maintains two valuable properties: his Trump National Golf Club and the sprawling Seven Springs estate.

Legal Arguments Heat Up

Trump's attorneys portrayed their client as facing an "insurmountable" challenge, claiming surety companies demand cash reserves of approximately 120% of the bond amount—roughly $557 million. They argued this requirement makes securing the bond "a practical impossibility."

However, Dennis Fan, representing the attorney general's office, dismissed these claims as exaggerated. "The defendants' argument is based on the false premise that they need to secure a single bond for the entire amount," Fan told the court, suggesting multiple smaller bonds could solve the problem.

Trump's Financial Reality Check

The hearing revealed Trump's lawyers acknowledging he lacks the liquid assets to cover the judgment personally, despite his frequent boasts about wealth. This admission underscores the serious financial pressure the legal penalties place on Trump's business empire.

What Happens Next?

The appellate judges gave no immediate indication of when they might rule, leaving Trump in legal limbo as the enforcement clock continues ticking. The outcome could determine whether one of America's most famous businessmen sees his signature properties fall into state control.