In a fiery condemnation of government policy, RMT union general secretary Mick Lynch has accused ministers of staggering hypocrisy over their approach to industrial action.
The outspoken union leader launched a scathing attack on the Conservatives' use of agency workers to break strikes while simultaneously imposing strict Minimum Service Levels (MSLs) on unions.
'Blatant Double Standards' Exposed
Lynch didn't mince words when addressing what he called the government's "blatant double standards." While unions face heavy restrictions and potential lawsuits under new MSL legislation, the government has actively encouraged the use of temporary staff to undermine legitimate strike action.
"They're creating one rule for us and another for themselves," Lynch stated. "While they tie our hands with legal red tape, they're bringing in agency workers to break strikes that have massive democratic support from our members."
Minimum Service Levels: A Contentious Legislation
The Conservative government's Minimum Service Levels law, which came into effect last year, represents one of the most significant changes to trade union legislation in decades. The law requires unions to ensure certain levels of service during strikes across key sectors including rail, health, and education.
However, critics argue the legislation tilts the playing field dramatically in employers' favour while undermining workers' fundamental right to strike.
Rail Disputes Continue Unabated
The controversy comes amid ongoing disputes between rail unions and train operating companies. The RMT has been engaged in one of the most sustained periods of industrial action in recent history, fighting for better pay and conditions for its members.
Lynch emphasised that the use of agency workers not only undermines strike action but potentially compromises safety standards. "These temporary staff don't have the same training or experience as our regular workforce," he warned.
Government Defence Falls Flat
While the government maintains that Minimum Service Levels are necessary to protect the public from excessive disruption, union leaders argue the legislation is designed to cripple effective industrial action.
Lynch's comments highlight the growing tension between the Conservative administration and trade unions, with many expecting further confrontations as the country approaches a general election.
The RMT leader concluded with a stark warning: "This government would rather attack working people than address the genuine concerns that lead to strike action. Their hypocrisy knows no bounds."
