
An employment tribunal has delivered a significant ruling, determining that a senior director's act of placing his hand on a female HR worker's shoulder was a 'fatherly' gesture and did not constitute sexual harassment.
The case, heard in Manchester, centred on allegations made by Ms Katie Watson against David Williams, a director at environmental consultancy firm EIC Ltd. Ms Watson claimed that the incident, which occurred during a meeting in July 2022, was part of a pattern of behaviour that created a 'hostile and degrading' environment.
The Tribunal's Findings
However, the panel judged that Mr Williams' action was an isolated, 'brief' contact made in a 'fatherly way' intended to offer reassurance. They found no malicious or sexual intent behind the gesture.
Beyond the physical contact, Ms Watson also alleged that she was subjected to unfair criticism and that her work was excessively scrutinised following the incident, which she reported to another manager. She claimed this amounted to victimisation, leading to her resignation.
A 'Culture of Banter'
The tribunal heard evidence describing the office atmosphere as one of 'robust language and sarcasm,' which was reportedly encouraged by management. While the tribunal acknowledged this 'culture of banter,' it concluded that the specific act of touching was not sexually motivated.
Ultimately, all of Ms Watson's claims – including sexual harassment and constructive dismissal – were dismissed. The tribunal found that her resignation was not solely caused by Mr Williams' actions but by a combination of factors, including her perception of the event.
This case highlights the complex nuances involved in interpreting workplace interactions and the high bar for proving harassment claims in a legal setting.