Yorkshire Building Society has abruptly terminated the joint bank account of a couple involved in pro-Palestine activism, sparking allegations of political discrimination in the banking sector.
Tom Charles, 42, and his partner received a sudden notification that their account would be closed within two months without any detailed explanation from the mutual society. The couple, who have maintained the account for several years, believe their political activities are the reason behind the unexpected closure.
"No Proper Explanation"
Mr Charles expressed his frustration, stating: "We were given no proper explanation. The society just said the relationship had broken down and that was it." The couple had been using their account to make regular donations to Medical Aid for Palestinians and the Palestine Solidarity Campaign.
Yorkshire Building Society defended its position, citing its right to close accounts without providing specific reasons under its terms and conditions. A spokesperson stated they make such decisions "only after careful consideration" and are "unable to discuss the details of individual cases."
Growing Pattern of Account Closures
This incident follows a worrying trend of UK banks closing accounts belonging to individuals and organisations involved in Palestinian advocacy. Earlier this year, HSBC faced criticism after shutting down the bank account of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign.
Mr Charles, who works in higher education, emphasised that their account had been used responsibly: "We've never been overdrawn. The only thing that stands out is our regular donations to Palestinian causes."
Broader Implications for Customer Rights
The case raises significant questions about the power financial institutions hold over customers engaged in legitimate political activities. Consumer rights advocates argue that banks should be more transparent when severing relationships with customers.
As Mr Charles noted: "It feels like we're being punished for our political views. This isn't just about us - it's about whether banks should have the power to quietly exclude people from the financial system because of their activism."
The couple are now seeking alternative banking arrangements while questioning whether financial service providers are increasingly monitoring customers' political activities and making decisions based on their personal views.
