From Romcoms to Doomscrolls: The Rise of Romantic Dread in Digital Dating
Romantic Dread Replaces Meet-Cutes in Modern Dating Culture

The End of the Meet-Cute: How Dating Apps Have Transformed Romantic Optimism

People once turned to romantic comedies to articulate their hopes for love, envisioning serendipitous encounters and soulful connections. Now, the meet-cute has been culturally retired, replaced by the doomscroll—a symbol of the exhaustion and ambiguity that defines modern dating. As Dr. Lisa Portolan notes, this shift reflects a deeper transformation in how we seek intimacy, moving from story-driven romance to task-oriented connection.

From Cinematic Dreams to Digital Reality

In early research on dating apps, participants frequently cited films like Meet Joe Black and Bridget Jones’s Diary to describe their romantic aspirations. They imagined chance meetings and luminous romances, often referencing actors like Jennifer Lopez as ideals. However, reality soon intervened: one participant bluntly stated, “Romcom love is for hot people. The dating apps are for the rest of us.” This stark division highlighted how apps became a sterile interface for the romantically ordinary, a consolation prize for those excluded from cinematic fantasies.

A decade later, dating apps are no longer a backup plan—they are the primary venue for romance. The cultural narrative has shifted from optimism to what Portolan terms romantic dread, a pervasive expectation that dating will be exhausting, ambiguous, and disappointing. This dread is fueled by the technological environment, where romance arrives via notifications and dopamine hits, and conversations often end in ghosting, a form of rejection so routine it barely registers.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

The Industrialisation of Relationship Anxiety

Dating apps have not invented relationship anxiety, but they have industrialised it. The endless catalogue of potential partners fosters a persistent belief that a better option is always one swipe away, creating fertile ground for relationship OCD and intrusive doubts. Participants describe compulsive app use in terms of relief rather than pleasure, with one woman noting, “I delete the apps when I feel overwhelmed, and then I reinstall them when I’m bored.” Another likened it to a second job, underscoring the burdensome nature of digital dating.

This shift is mirrored in broader cultural trends. In uncertain times, long-term romantic optimism feels indulgent, as the traditional script of marriage and happily-ever-after clashes with global instability. Cinema reflects this transformation, with films like The Drama, Marriage Story, and The Lobster exploring domestic unease, divorce, and dystopian coupling instead of aspirational love stories. Audiences now watch couples struggle to justify staying together, rather than overcoming obstacles to be united.

The Paradox of Persistent Connection

Despite the rise of romantic dread, the desire for connection persists. People continue to download apps, delete them, and reinstall them in a cycle of hope and exhaustion. They complain about dating fatigue while remaining embedded in the process, reframing the search for love as a task to be completed rather than a story waiting to unfold. This paradox highlights the uneasy space between the swipe’s promise of possibility and the expectation of disappointment.

As Portolan concludes, modern dating lives in this tension, where romantic aspiration has been replaced by romantic management. The cultural narratives that once sustained optimism have eroded, leaving users navigating a landscape of digital exhaustion and fleeting connections. Yet, the swiping continues, driven by an enduring, if weary, quest for intimacy in an increasingly complex world.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration