Simon Goodwin’s tenure as a coach has been a rollercoaster of scrutiny and acclaim. While nagging doubts about his methods persisted, it was his gameplan that ultimately marked his card—either as a visionary or a gambler who overplayed his hand.
The Lingering Questions
Critics have long questioned Goodwin’s decision-making, particularly in high-pressure moments. His reliance on unconventional tactics often left fans and pundits divided. Was he a genius ahead of his time, or simply stubborn?
The Gameplan That Defined Him
Goodwin’s approach was never orthodox. He favoured aggressive ball movement and risk-taking, a style that delivered thrilling victories but also exposed vulnerabilities. When it worked, it was electrifying; when it failed, the fallout was brutal.
The Turning Point
The 2025 season became a litmus test for Goodwin’s philosophy. Key matches hinged on his tactical adjustments, and while some paid off spectacularly, others backfired. In the end, it was this very gameplan that sealed his fate—earning him both admiration and criticism in equal measure.
Legacy in the Balance
Whether history remembers Goodwin as a pioneer or a cautionary tale depends on perspective. One thing is certain: his methods sparked debate and left an indelible mark on the sport.
