The security official responsible for protecting Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer faces intense scrutiny after revelations he previously managed an exclusive London club that counted a convicted Chinese spy among its members.
Matthew Power, head of Starmer's close protection team, was the general manager of the prestigious Library Club in Mayfair between 2013 and 2016. During this period, the club's membership included Christine Lee, a lawyer later exposed as a Chinese agent engaged in political interference operations.
Espionage Connections Revealed
Lee was described in a 2022 MI5 security alert as "knowingly engaging in political interference activities on behalf of the United Front Work Department" - a key agency of the Chinese Communist Party. Her activities prompted the first such warning ever issued by the security service about a specific individual.
The Library Club, located on St James's Street, served as an elite networking hub for politicians, business leaders, and diplomats during Power's tenure. Membership fees reached up to £1,200 annually, providing access to high-profile events and influential circles.
Security Vetting Questions Arise
Power's previous role has raised significant questions about the vetting procedures for officials protecting the man who could become Britain's next Prime Minister. Security experts have expressed concern about potential vulnerabilities in the protection details of senior political figures.
A Labour Party spokesperson stated: "All security personnel undergo thorough vetting processes. We do not comment on individual security arrangements."
Wider Political Implications
The revelation comes amid growing concern about Chinese influence operations in British politics. Christine Lee had cultivated relationships with multiple parliamentarians and made substantial political donations before being identified as an operative.
Security sources emphasise that while there's no suggestion Power was aware of Lee's activities, the connection highlights how easily foreign agents can access influential circles through elite London establishments.
The Metropolitan Police declined to comment on individual security arrangements, stating only that "all protection officers meet the highest standards of vetting and professionalism."
