Three members of the pro-Palestinian direct action group, Palestine Action, have concluded a gruelling 73-day hunger strike while in custody. The activists, Kamran Ahmed, Heba Muraisi, and Lewie Chiaramello, ceased their protest after claiming a significant victory: the UK Government's decision to deny a major contract to an Israeli defence firm.
Key Demands and Government Response
The activists initiated the hunger strike while awaiting trial for alleged offences including break-ins and criminal damage, charges they firmly deny. Their central demand was for the Government to block a substantial £2 billion contract with the Israeli-based defence company, Elbit Systems. According to statements from the activists' support network, this demand has now been met, leading to the end of their prolonged fast.
In a related development, national leaders of prison healthcare engaged in discussions with representatives of the hunger strikers to address concerns over prison conditions. This dialogue was facilitated by the support group Prisoners for Palestine, which continues to advocate for those detained.
The Wider Campaign Continues
Despite this development, the campaign is far from over. Prisoners for Palestine issued a statement declaring, “While these prisoners end their hunger strike, the resistance has just begun.” The collective's website indicates that one activist, Umer Khalid, remains on hunger strike, underscoring the ongoing nature of the protest.
The three individuals ended their strike on Thursday 15 January 2026, after a physically and mentally taxing 73 days. Their action highlights the intense tactics employed by some activist groups to influence UK defence procurement and foreign policy, particularly regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Legal Proceedings and Future Implications
The activists now return to the standard prison regime as they continue to contest the charges against them. Their case and the reported government decision on the Elbit contract are likely to fuel further debate around arms exports, protest rights, and the limits of direct action in the UK. The outcome sets a notable precedent for how similar campaigns might be conducted in the future.
