Why Awarding Donald Trump the Nobel Peace Prize Would Be Absurd
Why Trump Shouldn’t Get the Nobel Peace Prize

The idea of former US President Donald Trump receiving the Nobel Peace Prize has been met with widespread ridicule and disbelief. Critics argue that such an honour would not only be unjustified but would also tarnish the prestige of the award itself.

Questionable Diplomatic Achievements

While Trump's supporters have occasionally floated his name for the prize—citing his unconventional approach to foreign policy—many experts dismiss these claims as baseless. His tenure was marked by escalating global tensions, erratic diplomacy, and a disregard for multilateral institutions.

Undermining the Nobel Legacy

The Nobel Peace Prize has historically recognised individuals and organisations that have made significant contributions to peace, human rights, and conflict resolution. Awarding it to Trump, whose policies often exacerbated divisions, would set a dangerous precedent.

Public and Expert Backlash

Many political analysts and former laureates have voiced strong opposition to the idea. They argue that Trump's divisive rhetoric and actions—such as withdrawing from key international agreements and undermining democratic norms—are incompatible with the spirit of the prize.

A Matter of Credibility

Ultimately, granting the Nobel Peace Prize to Trump would risk politicising the award and diminishing its global standing. The Nobel Committee has a responsibility to uphold the integrity of the prize, and rewarding controversial figures could erode public trust.