In a surprising revelation, it has been disclosed that Gregg Wallace and John Torode, the beloved judges of BBC's MasterChef, earn far less than many might assume for their roles on the hit cooking show.
Despite the programme's global success and their high-profile status, the duo's salaries are reportedly modest compared to other TV personalities. Sources indicate that their earnings are a fraction of what some might expect, given the show's longevity and popularity.
How Much Do They Really Earn?
While exact figures remain confidential, insiders suggest that Wallace and Torode's pay packets are significantly lower than those of presenters on rival channels. This has sparked debate about the BBC's pay structure and whether its stars are fairly compensated.
Fan Reactions
Fans of the show have expressed shock at the news, with many taking to social media to voice their opinions. Some argue that the pair deserve higher salaries given their contribution to the show's success, while others praise the BBC for maintaining a balanced pay scale.
One fan tweeted: "Gregg and John are the heart of MasterChef – they should be paid like the stars they are!"
The Bigger Picture
This revelation comes amid ongoing discussions about pay disparities in the entertainment industry. With the BBC often under scrutiny for its spending, the salaries of its top talent remain a hot topic.
Whether Wallace and Torode will see a pay rise in the future remains to be seen, but for now, their fans are left wondering if their favourite chefs are getting the recognition they truly deserve.
