Harry's Ongoing Battle with the Palace
Prince Harry has once again been reminded that the House of Windsor always prevails, according to royal commentator Rebecca Russell. Writing for Express.co.uk, Russell argues that the Palace wins in public opinion, over the Sussexes' PR efforts, and in petty disputes, regardless of how many statements Harry's spokesperson issues.
The Palace's Strategy of Silence
Russell emphasizes that the Palace does not engage in drama, does not respond when fringe members of the Firm complain, and does not need to have the last word. When the Palace does choose to respond, that action alone carries significant weight. She cites Queen Elizabeth II's handling of the 1997 crisis, where a simple appearance and heartfelt address boosted her popularity.
Sussex Team's Counterproductive Tactics
The constant back-and-forth from Team Sussex, with defensive responses, erodes their status and makes them appear like a toddler throwing a temper tantrum, Russell writes. She notes that Harry's quick, unconsidered responses have been his Achilles heel since his relationship with Meghan became public, when he condemned a 'wave of abuse and harassment.'
Impact on Invictus Games and Family Reunion
The controversy surrounding Harry's UK return has overshadowed the positive work of the Invictus Games. Russell points out that the flurry of statements has caused confusion: Meghan, Archie, and Lilibet are not coming to London after a security request was rejected, but whether Meghan will appear in Birmingham remains unknown. It is also unclear if Harry will visit Princess Diana's grave or if King Charles will reunite with his youngest grandchildren.
Conclusion: A Lesson Unlearned
Russell concludes that Harry has spent years fighting for control of his narrative but remains blind to how he is outplayed. The institution has moved on without him and will not engage in a war of words. She asks, 'Will Harry ever learn?' and expresses hope that he will.
