Aged Care Provider Arcare Faces Class Action Over Illegal Fees
Arcare Aged Care Class Action Over Illegal Fees

A new class action lawsuit against Arcare, a leading aged care provider, alleges that more than 50 of its facilities charged residents for additional services they could not use or for services the provider was legally obliged to provide. The claim, filed in federal court, asserts that residents were billed for services such as high teas for those on restricted diets and Foxtel for unconscious patients.

Details of the Allegations

The class action, launched by a law firm representing affected residents, claims that Arcare imposed fees for services that were either unusable or already required by law. According to the statement of claim, these practices affected hundreds of residents across multiple states. The alleged charges include fees for exercise classes, entertainment packages, and other amenities that residents could not access due to medical conditions or dietary restrictions.

Impact on Residents

One resident’s family member stated, “My mother was charged for high teas and other activities she couldn’t participate in because of her dietary needs. It feels like they were taking advantage of vulnerable people.” The class action seeks compensation for all affected residents and their families, as well as changes to Arcare’s billing practices.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Legal and Regulatory Context

The case highlights ongoing concerns about transparency and fairness in aged care fees. Under Australian law, providers must ensure that charges for additional services are clearly communicated and optional. The class action argues that Arcare violated these requirements by automatically enrolling residents in paid services without proper consent.

Broader Implications

This lawsuit adds to growing scrutiny of the aged care sector, which has faced multiple inquiries and reforms in recent years. Advocates for older Australians have called for stronger regulations to prevent such practices. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how aged care providers bill for extra services.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration