Dragons' Den Entrepreneur Wins High Court Battle Over Dog Toilet Trademark
Dragons' Den Winner Sues Rival for Piddle Patch Trademark Infringement

Dragons' Den Entrepreneur Triumphs in High Court Trademark Dispute

A successful entrepreneur from the BBC's Dragons' Den has emerged victorious in a High Court battle against a businesswoman accused of copying her innovative indoor dog toilet invention. Rebecca Sloan, aged 39, who secured a substantial £50,000 investment on the popular television show, took legal action against Laurencia Walker-Fooks for allegedly misusing her trademarked brand name, 'Piddle Patch', to promote a competing product.

The Legal Battle and Judicial Findings

District Judge Araba Obodai presided over the case at the High Court, delivering a decisive verdict that found Ms Walker-Fooks had engaged in a deliberate campaign of trademark infringement. The judge stated unequivocally that Ms Walker-Fooks knew exactly what she was doing when she initiated what was described as a systematic infringement strategy. As a result, Ms Walker-Fooks has been ordered to pay compensation of up to £10,000 to Ms Sloan for the damages incurred.

Judge Obodai highlighted that the defendant's actions were not minor or accidental but constituted a calculated effort to commercially benefit from the established goodwill of the Piddle Patch trademark. By embedding the phrase into domain names and website content, Ms Walker-Fooks successfully drove traffic to her own company's site, City Doggo, which markets the rival Oui Oui Patch product.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Background of the Piddle Patch Invention

Rebecca Sloan first introduced her groundbreaking product to the dragons in 2022, though she had been selling it under the trademarked name Piddle Patch since September 2016. Her invention features real grass turf placed within a biodegradable litter tray, designed to housetrain dogs by mimicking an outdoor environment indoors. The concept proved immensely popular on Dragons' Den, attracting offers from four of the investors before Ms Sloan accepted £50,000 from Steven Bartlett.

The inspiration for Piddle Patch came during a routine visit to the park, where Ms Sloan observed how naturally dogs responded to grass for toileting. She aimed to replicate this stress-free experience within the home, leading to the creation of her eco-friendly solution. Following her television appearance, the product gained significant recognition and goodwill in the market.

Details of the Infringement

The court heard that within just three days of the Dragons' Den episode airing, Ms Walker-Fooks purchased multiple domain names containing the phrase 'piddle patch', redirecting them to her own website. She admitted to using the trademarked term for search engine optimisation purposes but argued that the infringement was too minor to be actionable under trademark law.

However, Judge Obodai rejected this defence, stating that the actions were a deliberate attempt to capitalise on the fame of Piddle Patch. The judge noted that this strategy effectively positioned City Doggo's website alongside Ms Sloan's in search results, misleading consumers into believing there was a commercial association between the two products.

Court's Assessment of Passing Off

In her ruling, Judge Obodai found Ms Walker-Fooks and City Doggo guilty of 'passing off', meaning they misrepresented to the public that their product was either the same as or connected to Ms Sloan's Piddle Patch. Based on cross-examination testimony, the judge concluded that this was precisely Ms Walker-Fooks' intention when she began her infringement campaign.

The judge emphasised that the infringements were neither negligible nor isolated incidents but part of a deliberate policy to promote the sign in the relevant market. She preferred Ms Sloan's evidence, noting the significant impact on the trademark's function and the cumulative effect of multiple infringements.

Compensation and Future Proceedings

The case will now return to court for a detailed assessment of the compensation owed to Ms Sloan's company, though it has been capped at a maximum of £10,000 by a previous judicial order. This outcome underscores the importance of protecting intellectual property in competitive business landscapes, particularly for entrepreneurs who gain public visibility through platforms like Dragons' Den.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration

Both products, Piddle Patch and Oui Oui Patch, utilise real grass turf to aid in housetraining dogs, reflecting a growing market for indoor pet solutions. Ms Walker-Fooks claimed she developed her product after experiencing the challenges of training her own dog, Tinkerbell, but the court found her actions crossed legal boundaries in seeking to leverage Ms Sloan's established brand success.