Uncertainty surrounds the HS2 high-speed rail project as an independent review examines its future, with costs potentially reaching £88bn. The Department for Transport is reportedly considering shortening the route to end at Old Oak Common in north-west London instead of tunnelling into central London.
Craig Douglas, former landlord of The Bree Louise pub near Euston station, which was demolished for HS2, described the impact as 'soul-destroying'. He said the area has been 'desecrated' and he has yet to receive full compensation, though HS2 Ltd says it is working to resolve this.
The review is exploring options including scrapping the project, ending at Old Oak Common, or running at slower speeds. Supporters argue HS2 is needed to free up rail capacity and create jobs, while opponents cite environmental damage and cost overruns.
Transport for London warns that terminating at Old Oak Common would overwhelm the Elizabeth Line during peak hours. The mayor of London also opposes shortening the route, saying it would short-change Londoners and the country.
Protesters camped near the planned line in Harefield hope the review will recommend scrapping HS2 to protect green belt land. Sarah Green, a two-year resident at the camp, said the project is 'having a terrible impact on the green belt and the green lungs of London'.
A Department for Transport spokesperson said the review will provide clear advice on how and whether the project should proceed, and the government will not pre-empt its findings.
