Labour leader Keir Starmer is facing mounting criticism over his handling of the party's stance on the ongoing Israel-Gaza conflict, with internal dissent growing and comparisons being drawn to the Jeremy Corbyn era.
Starmer's attempts to strike a balanced position have left many within the party dissatisfied, particularly those who supported Corbyn's more vocal pro-Palestinian stance. Critics argue that Starmer's approach lacks clarity and moral leadership, while others accuse him of alienating key voter blocs.
Growing Internal Divisions
The Labour leader's recent comments on the conflict have sparked anger among some MPs and party members, who feel he has failed to adequately address Palestinian suffering. This has led to renewed debate about the party's direction under Starmer's leadership.
Comparisons to Corbyn Era
Many on the left of the party are drawing unfavourable comparisons with Corbyn's tenure, when Labour took a more unequivocal position in support of Palestinian rights. Some MPs are now openly questioning whether Starmer's cautious approach is damaging the party's credibility on international issues.
The controversy comes at a sensitive time for Labour, as the party attempts to maintain unity ahead of the next general election. With the conflict showing no signs of abating, Starmer faces increasing pressure to clarify his position and address the concerns of disaffected members.
