The Smithsonian Institution has launched a review of the decor and renovations carried out during Donald Trump's tenure in the White House, examining whether the changes align with historical preservation standards.
Experts from the Smithsonian, America's premier museum and research complex, are assessing the alterations made to the historic residence, including the controversial gold curtains and other lavish additions. The review aims to determine if these modifications respect the building's heritage or deviate from its traditional aesthetic.
Controversial Changes Under Scrutiny
Among the most debated changes was the installation of gold-toned drapery in the Oval Office, a stark departure from the muted tones typically associated with the space. Critics argued that the opulent style clashed with the White House's dignified atmosphere, while supporters praised Trump's bold approach.
The review also focuses on other modifications, such as furniture selections and artwork placements, to evaluate their historical appropriateness. Smithsonian historians are cross-referencing these changes with archival records to ensure accuracy.
Political Reactions
The scrutiny has sparked mixed reactions. Some view it as a necessary step to preserve the White House's legacy, while others see it as a politically motivated move against the former president. Trump's team has yet to comment on the review.
This isn't the first time a president's decor choices have faced criticism. However, the Smithsonian's involvement adds a layer of institutional authority to the debate.
What's Next?
Once the review is complete, the Smithsonian may recommend adjustments to restore the White House's traditional appearance. Whether these suggestions will be implemented remains to be seen, as the current administration has not indicated its stance on the matter.
The findings could set a precedent for how future presidential renovations are evaluated, balancing personal expression with historical preservation.
