Readers have praised David Blunkett's alternative king's speech, calling it radical, clear, and purposeful, but have also pointed out several omissions. The former home secretary's proposed programme for government, published on 14 May, was welcomed for its focus on lifelong learning and citizenship education, which many feel the current government has failed to deliver.
Several correspondents highlighted the absence of a constitutional reform package, particularly proportional representation. Jol Miskin from Sheffield suggested that if Keir Starmer remains prime minister, he should bring Blunkett back into discussions instead of Gordon Brown and Harriet Harman. Martin Yarnit, also from Sheffield, proposed additions of self-sufficiency in food and fuel, and a change to proportional representation before Nigel Farage writes his own king's speech.
Linzi Banks from Kenilworth noted that Blunkett, despite being a former leader of Sheffield city council, failed to mention local government. She argued that the government must restore proper funding to councils, as well-delivered local services with visible results would persuade communities that they are not forgotten and demonstrate that voting and democracy matter.
Michael Fuller from Ampthill offered a cynical observation: politicians seem to know how to solve problems before they are in power and after they are removed, but not while in office. John Kitchen from Breachwood Green wondered whether Blunkett himself might be a worthy contender for the Labour leadership.
