The racing world has been rocked by a stunning controversy at Sydney's prestigious Royal Randwick racecourse, resulting in a severe ban for former AFL star Kieren Jack.
The explosive incident occurred during The Agency Real Estate Handicap on Saturday, when Jack, part-owner of horse Westminster, engaged in what officials have described as "unacceptable conduct" toward the animal.
Shocking Moment Captured on Camera
Race stewards launched an immediate investigation after Jack was seen making contact with Westminster in the mounting yard. The former Sydney Swans champion, who transitioned to horse ownership after his decorated AFL career, now faces serious consequences for his actions.
"The manner in which Mr. Jack interacted with the horse was completely inappropriate and against all standards of conduct we expect from licensed participants," stated chief steward Steve Railton in a damning assessment.
Severe Penalties Imposed
Racing NSW stewards didn't hold back in their punishment, handing Jack a three-month ban from all racing activities. The suspension prohibits him from:
- Attending any racecourse or training facility
- Participating in ownership activities
- Engaging with licensed racing personnel in official capacity
The penalty sends a clear message about animal welfare standards in the sport, particularly regarding treatment of thoroughbreds.
From Football Glory to Racing Controversy
Jack's fall from grace marks a dramatic turn for the former sporting hero. After a celebrated 233-game career with the Sydney Swans that included a 2012 premiership, his move into horse racing ownership was seen as a natural progression.
However, this incident has tarnished his reputation within the racing community and raised questions about the transition of professional athletes into horse ownership roles.
The controversy also casts a shadow over Westminster's performance, though stewards confirmed the horse emerged physically unharmed from the encounter.
Racing authorities have reinforced their commitment to maintaining the highest standards of animal welfare, with this case serving as a stark warning to all participants about the consequences of crossing the line.
