The United States' role as co-host of the 2026 World Cup is under scrutiny following a series of violent incidents involving federal agents, raising questions about the country's ability to ensure safety during the tournament. Critics argue that a nation where federal violence threatens citizens is unfit to stage soccer's premier event.
Recent events in Minneapolis, where federal agents killed two innocent people, have intensified concerns. The victims, Renee Good and Alex Pretti, were not threatening the officers, according to video evidence. Yet senior government figures have labelled them 'domestic terrorists', contradicting available footage. Such disregard for truth undermines trust in the US to host a secure World Cup.
Broader issues also cast doubt on US readiness. In 2025 alone, 32 people died in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody. The Trace, a nonprofit tracking gun violence, reports immigration officers shot at people 19 times since the start of a crackdown, including five killings. The crackdown has disproportionately targeted Democratic-leaning metro areas, which include 10 of the 11 US World Cup host cities.
FIFA president Gianni Infantino has stated that 'the most important message that football can convey right now is one of peace and unity'. However, critics question how soccer can promote unity when its showpiece event is hosted by an administration perceived as divisive. Removing the US as co-host would be logistically challenging and financially painful, but some argue it is justified given the circumstances.
