Wes Streeting's appointment as Defence Secretary has surprised many, including Conor Wilson, who outlines two major concerns and one potential upside.
Thin Experience and Political Favours
Wilson notes that efforts to bolster Streeting's defence credentials were counterproductive. Claims that he once visited the Falkland Islands and spoke in a debate were dismissed as laughable, underlining his lack of relevant experience.
Furthermore, the appointment appears to have been driven by political horse-trading. Reports indicate that Rachel Reeves was initially offered the role, and a source told Wilson that Yvette Cooper declined before it went to Streeting. Wilson argues that defence should not be used as political currency, and he questions Andy Burnham's decision-making.
Why It Might Still Work
Despite his scepticism, Wilson acknowledges that a Defence Secretary does not need military experience. Recent examples like Ben Wallace and Dan Jarvis are exceptions, not the norm. The role is about navigating government, representing defence, and securing resources for the department.
Streeting is ambitious, influential, and a big character in government and the party—traits that could help the MoD's rearmament plans. While someone like Al Carns would have deep understanding of modern warfare, he would lack Streeting's political influence and knowledge of government.
Wilson concludes that, with John Healey as Chancellor, Streeting could become a successful Defence Secretary, and he hopes that proves to be the case.
