NY Times Sues Pentagon Again Over Media Escort Rule
NY Times Sues Pentagon Again Over Media Escort Rule

The New York Times has filed a second lawsuit against the U.S. Defense Department, challenging a policy requiring journalists to be escorted while on Pentagon grounds. The newspaper argues that the escort rule violates the First Amendment and restricts independent reporting on military affairs.

Escort Policy Under Fire

The lawsuit, filed Monday in the District of Columbia district court, targets a policy implemented in March by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. The Times contends that the rule is an unconstitutional attempt to prevent independent journalism. A Times spokesman, Charlie Stadtlander, stated, "Americans deserve visibility into how their government is being run."

Pentagon Responds

Defense Department spokesperson Sean Parnell defended the policy on social media, calling the lawsuit an attempt to access classified information. He argued that journalists do not have the right to roam freely in federal buildings.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Escalating Tensions

This legal action follows a December lawsuit over earlier media restrictions. A federal judge struck down those rules, but an interim escort policy remained after an appeals court stay. The Times seeks to have the escort rule declared unconstitutional.

The newspaper and reporter Julian E. Barnes are plaintiffs in the new case, aiming to ensure press freedom. The Pentagon maintains that the policy is lawful and necessary to protect national security.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration