The Home Office has published official guidance telling asylum seekers not to rape or beat up women or to have sex with children, an admission of danger and failure that reveals the nation's disastrously porous control of its borders, according to Nick Ferrari.
The document, called 'Understanding Behaviours and Expectations in the UK: A Guide for Asylum Seekers,' will be handed to everyone arriving in the country seeking asylum. As it is likely to be made available in a wide variety of languages, the Home Office has been tight-lipped about the total cost.
Rise in sex crime convictions
The move follows an increase in the number of migrants being convicted of sex crimes, starkly highlighted by two recent cases. In March, Ahmad Mulakhil from Afghanistan was jailed for 15 years for raping a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton, Warwickshire. Earlier this month, Bruke Desalagne from Eritrea was convicted of raping a male pensioner in his sixties behind a church in Harrow, North London. The attack, lasting 20 minutes, was on a vulnerable old man.
Troublingly, the rest of this page could be filled with similar cases, prompting the question of what potential level of criminality is being allowed into the country, and why the only protection offered for girls of 12 against men in their sixties is a Home Office booklet.
Arrival figures and cultural clash
Figures from last year show 41,472 people arrived via small boat crossings, with the largest contingent coming from Eritrea (around 7,800), followed by Afghanistan (4,800), and then Iran and Sudan (4,400).
An uncomfortable truth is that in many of these asylum seekers' countries of origin, women are viewed as second class citizens, have limited rights, restricted freedom, and enjoy little protection in law. In some, female genital mutilation is still widely practiced.
When Nick Ferrari's late grandfather and father arrived in this country around a century ago, they were not handed leaflets such as these, nor were they given free accommodation and a daily spending allowance. The fact that the nation has now descended to this pit of servile acceptance of the dangers these people pose is nothing short of grotesque.
Protests and government response
Suddenly those demonstrators daring enough to protest about the arrival of large groups of mostly undocumented young males in their communities can be seen to have fears valid enough to rattle the Home Office to publish this guide. The charge that they were 'bigots' or 'racists' can be dismissed as the usual dreary leftie approach to anything, or anyone, they disagree with.
The sad truth is that there is an irreconcilable clash here, as too many foreign cultures do not match our own. But if many of these people present such a danger in the view of the Government, why are they allowed to roam free from their camps all day?
