Charities have condemned as 'arrogant' the UK government's plans to house asylum seekers at former military sites, warning that the locations are isolated and lack adequate support services. The proposals, which include using disused army barracks and RAF bases, have been criticised by refugee charities and local authorities.
Plans Unveiled for Asylum Accommodation
The Home Office confirmed that it is exploring the use of former military sites to accommodate asylum seekers, citing the need to reduce the use of hotels. The sites under consideration include former RAF bases in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire, as well as army barracks in Kent and Essex. The government argues that these sites offer a cost-effective solution to the current housing crisis for asylum seekers.
However, charities have reacted with fury. Enver Solomon, chief executive of the Refugee Council, said: 'These plans are arrogant and show a complete disregard for the wellbeing of people who have fled persecution. Placing them in isolated former military sites with limited access to legal advice, healthcare, and community support is deeply concerning.'
Charities Warn of Isolation and Lack of Support
Refugee Action and the British Red Cross have also voiced strong opposition. They argue that the sites are often located in remote areas, making it difficult for asylum seekers to access essential services. 'These sites are not suitable for long-term accommodation,' said a spokesperson for Refugee Action. 'They lack the infrastructure needed to support vulnerable people, including mental health services and integration support.'
Local councils have echoed these concerns. The leader of Lincolnshire County Council, Martin Hill, said that the plans were imposed without consultation. 'We were not informed about these proposals until they were leaked to the press. This is not how you work with local communities.'
Government Defends Cost-Saving Measures
The Home Office defended the plans, stating that they are necessary to reduce the £8 million per day spent on housing asylum seekers in hotels. A spokesperson said: 'We are committed to providing safe and secure accommodation for asylum seekers while their claims are processed. Using former military sites is a pragmatic approach that saves taxpayer money.'
However, critics point out that similar schemes in the past have led to poor outcomes. In 2022, the use of former military barracks in Scotland was criticised for poor living conditions and lack of support, leading to protests and legal challenges.
Impact on Asylum Seekers
Asylum seekers currently housed in hotels have expressed anxiety about the proposed moves. Many fear being placed in remote locations with limited access to legal representation. 'I am worried that if I am moved to a former army base, I will not be able to find a lawyer to help with my case,' said one asylum seeker living in a London hotel.
Charities are calling for a more humane approach, including the use of community-based accommodation and increased support for integration. 'The government must listen to experts and local communities,' said Solomon. 'These plans are not only arrogant but also counterproductive. They will create more problems than they solve.'
