Leaders of the nationalist group Raise the Colours have agreed to stop hoisting England flags on lamp-posts in Oxfordshire after the local authority sought a high court injunction against the campaign.
Court hearing and agreement
Ryan Bridge, Ben Cullen and Trudy Wells told the high court on Tuesday they would not raise St George’s flags from Oxfordshire county council property, encourage others to do so or impede council workers from taking them down. Cullen told the court that a fourth leader of the group, Kevin Good, who was not present in court, had also agreed to have “nothing more to do with flags” in Oxfordshire.
Mr Justice Dias indicated he would be willing to support the council’s application for an injunction against unauthorised flag raising by the four defendants as well as “persons unknown”, subject to the wording of the order being agreed.
Background of the campaign
The Raise the Colours campaign has been putting up flags across the country since August last year, the court heard. Bridge, who like all three defendants was representing himself, told the court the council were using “bullying tactics” but he agreed to the proposed terms of the injunction. He said: “It is a sad day for the flag of our country and what it represents.”
Seeking clarification from the judge about what could amount to encouraging others to raise flags from lampposts, he said: “My worry is that by putting a flag up for the football tonight that would be encouraging others. That’s outrageous. It’s outrageous that I’m here.” Dias said Bridge could continue erecting flags from his own property as he was “legally entitled to do”.
Defendants' statements
At the start of the hearing, Cullen said: “My position is I would still like to keep putting flags up in Oxfordshire.” Later, he said: “I will not do it in future in Oxfordshire.” Wells said: “I’m not going to have anything to do with the flags any more.”
Council's allegations
Documents submitted to the court by the Liberal Democrat-led council said it was seeking to ban “attaching flags or causing flags to be attached to highway structures; painting or marking flags on the highway; obstructing officers or contractors from removing flags from highway structures; and causing harassment, alarm or distress to officers or contractors who are or have been involved in the removal of flags from highway structures”.
Bridge, Cullen and Wells agreed to sign a written undertaking to comply with such an injunction. The council accused them and others of “repeatedly and unlawfully” attaching flags to lamp-posts and other highway structures and having encouraged others to do the same. They also ignored requests to desist, the court heard.
Intimidation claims
In documents submitted to the court, the council accused members of the campaign of intimidating council staff. It said: “The named defendants and others have also obstructed the claimant’s employees and contractors while they have sought to remove flags from highway structures, and/or attempted to intimidate the claimant’s employees and contractors by ‘naming and shaming’ them. It added: “A member of the council has been targeted. In January 2026, flags were attached to lampposts in her street and she has been subjected to hostile and abusive emails.”
