On the trail with the hunters who believe shooting big game can save Africa’s wildlife – a perspective that divides opinion. One way to pay for wildlife conservation is to allow the rich to bag a few animals for high prices. But critics see this approach as an exercise in neocolonialism.
Written and read by Cal Flyn, this audio long read explores the controversial practice of trophy hunting as a conservation tool. The piece is adapted from Flyn's book The Savage Landscape: How We Made the Wilderness, published by William Collins on 7 May. Support the Guardian by ordering a copy from guardianbookshop.com (delivery charges may apply).
The Debate Over Trophy Hunting
Proponents argue that regulated hunting provides crucial funding for anti-poaching efforts, habitat preservation, and local communities. In some cases, it has led to population increases for endangered species. However, opponents contend that killing charismatic animals for sport is morally reprehensible and perpetuates colonial attitudes where wealthy Westerners exploit African resources.
Voices from the Ground
Cal Flyn joins hunters in the field to understand their motivations. For them, conservation is a pragmatic business: if wildlife has economic value, it will be protected. Yet local communities often see little benefit, raising questions about who truly profits.
The podcast delves into the complexities of conservation funding, the ethics of commodifying nature, and the search for sustainable solutions. As Africa's wildlife faces unprecedented threats, the debate over hunting's role remains fiercely contested.
