Liberal frontbencher Andrew Hastie has sparked controversy by describing multiculturalism as a “politically loaded term” that is as “extreme” as the word “monoculture.” In an interview with ABC’s Afternoon Briefing, Hastie argued that both terms represent extremes and that multiculturalism has become a loaded political term, despite most Australians associating it with cultural diversity such as different foods and backgrounds.
Hastie's Stance on Immigration
Despite declaring “war” on One Nation, Hastie promoted an approach to immigration similar to that of Pauline Hanson, the leader of the right-wing party. Earlier this month, Hanson stated in her first National Press Club speech that Australia cannot be multicultural and must exist as a “monocultural society.” Hastie echoed this sentiment, saying, “In the end, if a democracy’s going to function, you have to have a common set of values. It can’t just be a free for all, [living] according to how you think the world should be.”
Liberal Party Struggles with Multiculturalism
The Liberal Party has struggled to define its position on multiculturalism and immigration as it attempts to stem the loss of voters to Hanson’s party. Hastie refused to label One Nation as “hard right” and expressed a desire to win back its voters who had defected from the Coalition, rather than alienating them. He stated, “People are drawn to strength, and so I think we should be sending a strong message that we are committed to winning government [and] delivering centre right government for the Australian people.”
Reactions and Implications
Hastie’s comments have drawn criticism for blurring the lines between the Liberal Party and One Nation. The remarks come amid internal confusion within the Liberals, as highlighted by previous comments from Angus Taylor on multiculturalism. The party faces the challenge of maintaining its base while appealing to voters tempted by Hanson’s hardline stance.
