The BBC's flagship historical drama, 'King and Conqueror', has been hit by a tsunami of viewer complaints, plunging the corporation into a fresh controversy over historical accuracy. The series, which charts the brutal power struggle between Harold Godwinson and William the Conqueror, is now the subject of an official Ofcom probe after hundreds accused it of distorting British history.
Audiences and historians alike have expressed outrage over the show's creative liberties, particularly its portrayal of King Harold II. Instead of the revered last Anglo-Saxon king, viewers claim he is depicted as a "weak and indecisive" leader, a characterization that has sparked fury among those who believe it undermines his historical significance.
Ofcom Steps In Amid Accuracy Backlash
The UK's communications regulator, Ofcom, has confirmed it is assessing the complaints to determine whether a formal investigation is warranted. The volume of complaints has been significant enough to trigger this preliminary stage, putting the BBC under intense scrutiny.
Beyond the characterisation of Harold, the series has been criticised for a broader "lack of historical fidelity". Critics point to everything from costuming and settings to the overarching narrative, arguing it prioritises sensational drama over educational value, a key part of the BBC's public service remit.
A Costly Gamble for the BBC
The controversy is a significant blow for the BBC, which had high hopes for the eight-part series. Boasting a star-studded cast including James Norton and Nicolas Coster-Waldau, the drama was a major investment intended to be a ratings winner and a centrepiece of its autumn scheduling.
This is not the first time a BBC historical production has faced criticism for its factual approach. However, the scale and speed of the backlash against 'King and Conqueror' mark it out, suggesting a growing viewer intolerance for what they perceive as the rewriting of national history for entertainment's sake.
The BBC now faces a waiting game as Ofcom deliberates. The outcome could influence how the corporation approaches future historical storytelling, balancing creative ambition with its commitment to factual integrity.
