Mirror Readers Overwhelmingly Oppose Harry and Meghan's 'Pseudo-Royal' Tours
Mirror Readers Oppose Harry and Meghan's 'Pseudo-Royal' Tours

Overwhelming Public Opposition to Sussexes' International Trips

A recent poll conducted by the Mirror has revealed that an overwhelming majority of readers believe Prince Harry and Meghan Markle should not be permitted to carry out international trips that closely resemble official royal tours. The survey, which garnered responses from over 19,000 participants, found that a staggering 93 percent of respondents oppose the couple's so-called 'pseudo-royal' tours, while only 7 percent expressed support for their overseas charitable engagements.

Recent Australian Visit Reignites Controversy

The debate has been reignited following the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's recent whirlwind trip to Australia, their first visit to the country since 2018. Over the course of four days, Harry and Meghan attended charity events in Sydney, Melbourne, and Canberra, engaging in public-facing visits and private commercial appearances. This marked their second major international trip this year, following a two-day visit to Jordan in February at the invitation of the World Health Organisation's director-general.

Despite sources close to the Sussexes insisting that the Australian trip was "rooted in long-standing areas of work" with a focus on "amplifying organisations delivering measurable impact," many critics have questioned the nature of these visits. Since stepping down as working royals in 2020, Harry and Meghan's international charitable work has been conducted without any official royal capacity, leading to accusations that they are engaging in 'faux royal tours' that mimic the hallmarks of official state visits.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Royal Expert Defends Sussexes' Approach

Royal commentator Jennie Bond has challenged the characterization of these trips as 'pseudo-royal tours,' pointing out that the couple themselves have never used this terminology. "Harry and Meghan have never called it that," Bond told the Mirror. "They are not doing any walkabouts or, as far as we know, having high-level discussions with dignitaries or politicians."

Bond emphasized that the Sussexes are simply pursuing the vision they outlined when they stepped back from royal duties: "This kind of visit is precisely what Harry and Meghan wanted to do at the start of the whole sorry story that led them stepping down as working Royals. They wanted to combine earning a living with some charitable work. So, here they are doing exactly that. What's the problem?"

Mixed Reactions from Australian Public

The Australian visit elicited mixed reactions from local residents. While some Australians welcomed the couple's charitable efforts, others expressed skepticism about their motivations. Following their arrival in Sydney, several residents told the BBC that they found the couple "boring," with one adding: "I don't know why they're coming." Another Sydney resident commented: "They are very much about self promotion, they'd probably be my least favourite royals, put it that way."

Despite this criticism, Jennie Bond noted that the narrative surrounding the Sussexes' international work may be shifting as their trip progressed. "I'm sure they were perfectly aware that they would be criticised from various quarters for their trip to Australia," Bond observed. "And, predictably, there have been some disparaging headlines. But, as the visit has progressed, the tone is changing. Some are now talking about the very warm reception that the couple have been given."

The Ongoing Debate Over Post-Royal Roles

The controversy highlights the ongoing tension surrounding Harry and Meghan's post-royal activities and public perception. While the couple's supporters argue they are simply pursuing independent charitable work aligned with their personal values, critics contend that their international trips too closely resemble the official tours they conducted as working royals, creating confusion about their current status and potentially undermining the monarchy's official engagements.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration

As the Sussexes continue to balance commercial ventures with philanthropic efforts, the debate over appropriate boundaries for former working royals shows no signs of abating. With the Mirror poll demonstrating significant public skepticism about these international visits, the couple faces continued scrutiny as they navigate their unique position outside the formal royal structure while maintaining global visibility for their charitable causes.