Gianni Infantino's latest plan to sell off stakes in the World Cup to private investors has reignited calls for change at football's governing body. The FIFA president's proposal is the most recent in a string of decisions that critics say show the organisation is not fit for purpose.
Infantino's record under fire
Infantino has faced persistent criticism for turning a blind eye to human rights records in host nations such as Russia and Qatar, and for cosying up to Donald Trump's administration ahead of the 2026 World Cup. Critics also point to the newly-created FIFA Peace Prize and the reversal of Folarin Balogun's red card, which they say shows the rules of the game are no longer sacrosanct.
UEFA nations consider boycott
UEFA nations are reportedly considering a World Cup boycott, a move that some believe should be welcomed. Six of the last eight teams at this year's edition were UEFA nations, highlighting the dependence of the World Cup on European teams.
Funding proposal linked to election
FIFA says the motive behind opening the World Cup to American investors is to increase funding per member association from $8 million to $20 million for the 2027-30 cycle. The next FIFA presidential election will also be held in 2027. While increased funding for developing nations is important, critics argue this is not the right way to achieve it.
The way forward
The article argues that the World Cup is not Infantino's to sell off, and as long as he controls FIFA, its reputation will remain tarnished. The two options are either ousting Infantino and implementing widespread reforms, or creating a breakaway governing body that prioritises the sport's interests. With Option A seeming increasingly unlikely, true football fans are hoping Option B becomes a reality.
