Trump 'Furious' with Marjorie Taylor Greene Over Epstein Files Petition
Trump 'Furious' with MTG Over Epstein Files Support

In a revealing television interview, US Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene has disclosed that former President Donald Trump was left "extremely angry" with her for backing the release of the full Jeffrey Epstein client list.

The 60 Minutes Revelation

Speaking to CBS News' flagship programme 60 Minutes in an interview that aired on Saturday, 6th December 2025, the Georgia representative explained her decision to sign a petition demanding transparency around the Epstein case. Greene stated she believed the women who were trafficked and abused by the late financier "deserve everything they're asking for" in their quest to have the documents made public.

According to Greene's account, Trump confronted her over the move, warning that releasing the files "was going to hurt people." This explanation formed the basis of his reported fury at one of his most vocal congressional allies.

An Escalating Public Feud

This incident is not an isolated one, but rather the latest flashpoint in a rapidly deteriorating relationship between the two figures. Trump has previously launched public, personal attacks on Greene, branding her "Marjorie Traitor Greene" and dismissing her as a "ranting lunatic."

Greene has fired back with serious allegations of her own. She has accused the former president of endangering her life through what she describes as "unwarranted and vicious attacks." Furthermore, she has levelled criticism at 'MAGA Inc,' the primary super PAC supporting Trump's campaign, questioning its priorities and strategy.

Broader Implications and Fallout

The public dispute highlights significant fractures within the core Trump support base as the next election cycle approaches. Greene's stance positions her alongside victims' advocacy groups, creating a rare point of divergence from Trump on a high-profile issue concerning accountability and alleged elite misconduct.

The fallout from this rift remains uncertain. However, the public nature of the accusations—from treachery to life-endangering rhetoric—suggests a deep and potentially lasting schism between two of the most prominent voices on the American right, with implications for party unity and future political strategy.