CV Lies: From Archer to Arday, Truth Takes a Backseat
CV Lies: From Archer to Arday, Truth Takes a Backseat

Reed, Britain's biggest recruiter, revealed last year that 60% of the career histories it sees 'have some form of error'. This statistic sets the stage for a closer look at how truth is often stretched in professional and political spheres.

High-Profile Examples of Embellishment

Former MP Jeffrey Archer falsely implied he held an MA from Oxford University, and claimed six O levels and three A-levels, when he actually left school with three O levels and no A-levels. He also suggested his father was a war hero, but in reality, Archer senior was a bigamist who fled to New York in 1914 to escape fraud allegations. Despite this, Archer became Deputy Chairman of the Conservative Party and remains a life peer.

Jason Arday, the Cambridge University professor who quit his post this month, faced concerns over plagiarism, embellishment, and his academic credentials. While this article does not defend anything indefensible, it aims to provide context and defend his right to emotional wellbeing. The issue is complex and extends beyond him.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

The Meritocracy Debate

A minority of critics have used the Arday case to justify the view that all Black people in senior public life are there solely because of DEI (Diversity, Equity and Inclusion). One instigator of the Arday inquiries published a blog post two years ago arguing that in a true meritocracy, Black people would disappear from almost all high-profile positions outside of sports and entertainment.

The controversy shows that even white liberals, in this case Cambridge, have the power to decide which world Black people are allowed to thrive in. Across the judiciary, the arts, academia, media, politics, and sport, nepotism and networks continue to masquerade as meritocracy.

Political Misrepresentations

Before Boris Johnson's ascent to No10, his former editor Max Hastings vilified him in a column, writing, 'I was Boris Johnson’s boss... he is utterly unfit to be prime minister.' Hastings added, 'Johnson would not recognise truth, whether about his private or political life, if confronted by it in an identity parade.' Quoting Bishop Berkeley, he went on, 'It is impossible that a man who is false to his friends and neighbours should be true to the public.' Johnson cruised into Downing Street and presided over a shameful chapter in the country's history.

Labour's ex-Chancellor Rachel Reeves worked at the Bank of England for around five-and-a-half years, not 'a decade' as she had suggested. Last September, Tory leader Kemi Badenoch's claim that she'd been offered a place to study medicine at Stanford was challenged by Stanford. Labour's Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds apologised for saying he'd worked as a solicitor when he'd never qualified. Green Party leader Zack Polanski's campaign literature claimed he'd worked for a 'justice assessment committee' at the Ministry of Justice, but no such committee or direct employment existed. Reform MP Robert Jenrick's website was forced to correct claims he'd been 'the joint youngest Cabinet Minister since the Second World War, tied with Harold Wilson and William Hague'.

None of this suggests Arday should escape accountability, but it does suggest few of us are in a position to cast the first stone.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration