Microphones and Boothroyd-style projection both have their place on stage, say letter writers
Microphones and Boothroyd-style projection both have their place on stage, say letter writers

Recent debate over the growing use of microphones in theatre has prompted two readers to share their perspectives, arguing that both amplified sound and traditional voice projection have their merits.

Richard Lee of Leigh-on-Sea, Essex, highlights the benefits of microphones for audience members with hearing loss. He notes that when a sound operator sends a microphone signal directly through a loop system, anyone using hearing aids or the theatre’s own headphones receives unparalleled clarity. Along with captioning, this is a lifeline for millions of theatregoers. Lee acknowledges that older performers may prefer unenhanced “shouting at night” as the purest form of theatre, but he points out that one in three people in the UK has some degree of hearing loss and would disagree.

Chris Walters of Buxton, Derbyshire, recalls a different approach: the power of projection. He was reminded of an Open University awards ceremony where the microphone failed. The late Betty Boothroyd, former Speaker of the House of Commons, instructed the announcer to project in her best Speaker’s voice. Walters describes it as a lovely moment, illustrating that traditional vocal training can still be effective when technology fails.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration
Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list