Pressure is mounting on the UK government to make black history a compulsory element of the national curriculum in England, moving beyond its current optional treatment during Black History Month. Schools minister Nick Gibb has opposed the idea, arguing that teachers need the freedom to teach lessons appropriate for their pupils.
Funmilola Stewart, head of history at Dixons Trinity Academy in Bradford, said that a broad and balanced curriculum cannot exist without black history. She noted that while studying the British empire is compulsory, learning about slavery is not. Stewart emphasised the need to teach students about the slave trade, civil rights, and positive aspects such as African kingdoms and black individuals in Tudor society, stating that black history did not begin with slavery.
Emily Folorunsho, head of history at Barking Abbey School, argued that making black history compulsory would hold teachers accountable and prevent bias, particularly in rural areas where it might be omitted. She said black history can be integrated into existing topics, citing the example of the black Roman emperor Septimus Severus. Folorunsho stressed that black history creates belonging for black students and corrects misconceptions for white students.
However, Calvin Robinson, an education consultant and former teacher, disagreed, stating that black history should not be compulsory because history should not be taught based on race. He said the current national curriculum is broad and balanced, covering themes such as the British empire and Commonwealth.
The debate highlights differing views on how to address historical narratives and ensure a comprehensive education for all students in England.
